• Home
    • About
      • About the Journal
      • Editorial Team
      • Editorial Policies
      • Submissions
    • Contact
    • Content
      • Articles
      • Issue Archive
      • Special Collections
    • Research Integrity
    \

    Log in

    Don't have an account? Register Here
    Log in With ORCiD

    -------------- OR --------------
    You can reset your password here
    Register
    Start Submission

    Reading: Conceptualising rehabilitation in late modern society

    Share:

    Download

    • PDF (EN)
    • XML (EN)
    A- A+
    • View Harvard Citation Style
    • View Vancouver Citation Style
    • View APA Citation Style
    Alt. Display

    Original Articles

    Conceptualising rehabilitation in late modern society

    Authors:

    Jan-Inge Hanssen ,

    Department of Social Sciences, Bodo Regional University, Norway
    X close

    Johans Tveit Sandvin

    Department of Social Sciences, Bodo Regional University, Norway
    X close

    Abstract

    Being traditionally a correcting and repairing practice, anchored in the modernistic visions of the European welfare states, rehabilitation is today subject to substantial revisions. The concept and practices of rehabilitation are under pressure from multiple directions. Traditional rehabilitation is challenged from above by way of pressure from political institutions demanding more and better rehabilitation services with less resources. It is challenged from inside where an increasing number of professions fight each other for a (fair) share of the increasing rehabilitation market It is challenged from outside where its orderly modernistic vision is met by disorderliness and diversity, and from below, by a growing and stronger disability movement eager to free itself from the chains of oppressing categories and labels imposed by paternalistic professionals. As a respond to this, the purpose and goals of rehabilitation is substantially extended to include also societal participation and equal opportunities for disabled people. The question asked in this paper is whether the concept of rehabilitation will survive the challenges and shift in perspective that we are now witnessing?
    How to Cite: Hanssen, J.-I. and Sandvin, J.T., 2003. Conceptualising rehabilitation in late modern society. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 5(1), pp.24–41. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/15017410309512610
    87
    Views
    50
    Downloads
    8
    Citations
      Published on 01 Jul 2003
    Peer Reviewed
     CC BY 4.0

    References

    1. Almås , R. , Karlsen , K. and Thorland , I. (1997). . Fra pliktsamfunn til mulighetstorg. Tre generasjoner skriver sin ungdom (From the society of duty to the market place of opportunity. Three generations write about their youth). , [city: Trondheim]: : Senter for Bygdeforskning Center for Rural Research. .  

    2. Bauman , Z. (2001). . The individualized society. , [city: Cambridge]: : Polity Press. .  

    3. Bauman , Z. (2000). . Liquid Modernity. , [city: Cambridge]: : Polity Press. .  

    4. Bauman , Z. (1998). . Globalization. The Human Consequences. , [city: Cambridge]: : Polity Press. .  

    5. Beck , U. (1992). . Risk society, towards a new modernity. , [city: London]: : Sage. .  

    6. Becker , H. (1963). . Outsiders. , [city: New York]: : The Free Press. .  

    7. Bourdieu , P. (1994). . Centrale texter inden for sociologi og kulturteori. , [city: Copenhagen]: : Akademisk Forlag. .  

    8. Bråten , S. (1998). . Kommunikasjon og samspill: fra fødsel til alderdom. , [city: Oslo]: : Tano Aschehoug. .  

    9. Cohen , S. (1985). . Visions of Social Control. , [city: Cambridge]: : Polity Press. .  

    10. Eriksen , E.O. and Loftager , J. (1996). . The Rationality of The welfare State. , [city: Oslo]: : Scandinavian University Press. .  

    11. Eriksen , E.O. (1993). . Den offentlige dimensjonen. Verdier og styling i offentlig sektor. (The Public Dimension. Values and management in public sector). , [city: Oslo]: : TANO. .  

    12. Eriksen , E.O. (1996). . “Justification of Needs.”. . In The Rationality of The welfare State. , Edited by: Eriksen and Loftager  . [city: Oslo]: : Scandinavian University Press. .  

    13. Eriksen , E.O. (2001). . Demokratiets sorte hull Om spenningen mellom fag og politikk i velferdsstaten. (The Black Hole of Democracy. The tensions between professions and politics in the welfare state). , [city: Oslo]: : abstrakt forlag. .  

    14. Esping‐Andersen , Gösta . (1990). . . The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. , [city: Cambridge]: : Polity Press. .  

    15. Feiring , M. (1996). . “Et streiftog gjennom rehabiliteringsbegrepets historic”; (A brief historical outline of the concept of rehabilitation). ”. In Norsk lærebok i rehabilitering. (Norwegian rehabilitation textbook). , Edited by: Wekre , Lena Lande and Vardeberg , Kjersti  . [city: Bergen]: : Fagbokforlaget. .  

    16. Giddens , A. (1991). . Modernity and Self‐Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. , [city: Oxford]: : Polity Press. .  

    17. Hvinden , B. (). Activation: a Nordic perspective. . Paper presented at the conference: Linking welfare to work. . [city: Dublin].  

    18. Ingstad , B. and Whyte , S.R. (1995). , eds. . Disability and Culture. , [city: Berkley]: : University of California Press. .  

    19. Knøsen , E. and Krokan , A.K. (2003). . Den tause diskrimineringen. Nytt fokus på funksjonshemming. , [city: Oslo]: : Kommuneforlaget/ SKUR. .  

    20. Leaper , R (). . The Beveridge Report in its Contemporary Setting. In “Social Security. . 50 Years after Beveridge. International Conference at University of York, England. . [city: York]. SPRU. .  

    21. Lillestø , Britt . (1998). . . Når omsorgen oppleves krenkende. , NF‐rapport 22/98[city: Bodø]: : Nordlandsforskning. .  

    22. Lyotard , J‐F. (1984). . The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. , [city: Minneapolis]: : University of Minnesota press. .  

    23. Oliver , M. (1996). . Understanding disability. From theory to practice. , [city: New York]: : St Martin's Press. .  

    24. Pierson , C. (1991). . Beyond the welfare state?: the new political economy of welfare. , [city: Cambridge]: : Polity Press. .  

    25. Sandvin , J.T. (2003). . “Loosening bonds and changing identities ‐ Growing up with impairments in post‐war Norway”. . Disability Studies Quarterly., , Accepted for publication in. 

    26. Sandvin , J.T. and Söder , M. (1996). . “Welfare state construction.”. . In Intellectual disabled in the Nordic welfare states. Policies and everyday life. , Edited by: Tøssebro , Guvstavsson and Dyrendal  . [city: Kristiansand]: : Høyskoleforlaget. .  

    27. Seierstad , S. , Eide , A.K. , Helle , K.M. and Schafft , A. (1998). . Evaluering av de statlige Arbeidssamvirketiltakene og de kommunale aktivitetstilbudene for yrkeshemmede. , AFI‐rapportserie nr. 5/98[city: Oslo]: : Arbeidsforskningsinstituttet. .  

    28. SOU 2000:78 (). . Den arbetslivsinnriktade rehabiliteringen. (Vocational rehabilitation). , [city: Stockholm]: : Mini. .  

    Hanssen, J.-I. and Sandvin, J.T., 2003. Conceptualising rehabilitation in late modern society. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 5(1), pp.24–41. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/15017410309512610

    Hanssen J-I, Sandvin JT. Conceptualising rehabilitation in late modern society. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. 2003;5(1):24–41. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/15017410309512610

    Hanssen, J.-I., & Sandvin, J. T. (2003). Conceptualising rehabilitation in late modern society. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 5(1), 24–41. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/15017410309512610

    1. Hanssen J-I, Sandvin JT. Conceptualising rehabilitation in late modern society. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research. 2003;5(1):24-41. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/15017410309512610

    Hanssen J-I and Sandvin JT, ‘Conceptualising Rehabilitation in Late Modern Society’ (2003) 5 Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 24 DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/15017410309512610

    Hanssen, Jan-Inge, and Johans Tveit Sandvin. 2003. “Conceptualising Rehabilitation in Late Modern Society”. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 5 (1): 24–41. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/15017410309512610

    Hanssen, Jan-Inge, and Johans Tveit Sandvin. “Conceptualising Rehabilitation in Late Modern Society”. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 5, no. 1 (2003): 24–41. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/15017410309512610

    Hanssen, J-Iand J T Sandvin. “Conceptualising rehabilitation in late modern society”. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, vol. 5, no. 1, 2003, pp. 24–41. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/15017410309512610

    Jump to Discussions
    comments powered by Disqus
    • E-ISSN: 1745-3011
    • Published by Stockholm University Press
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy